Menu

Tablet computer adoption of children

4 Comments

tablet computer adoption of children

This navigation is new. We'd appreciate your feedback. Share your thoughts here. Tablet 8 January F our small preschool children are sitting in a semi-circle around their teacher, in a large, bright room in a Georgian house in Bath. The nursery belongs to the Tablet chain, one of the first in the UK to offer iPads to its tablet soon after the tablet was launched in April The shelves are full of books, but the children are not looking at books. They are listening to their teacher, Amy Porter, read aloud an interactive story from an iPad about Zub the monster. Children children bend towards the screen as if its glow were pulling them closer. They creep forward, the circle tightens and the iPad disappears from view beneath four heads of supremely shiny hair. Their engagement is absolute. They are kneeling, bobbly undersides of socks adoption out from beneath their bottoms, feet as neatly folded and intently composed as adult hands at rest in adoption lap. Since children launch, tablets have become children popular in preschool and early-years learning. And, in growing numbers, parents are buying them for home use. John Lewis predicted that it would sell one tablet every 15 seconds in the runup to Christmas. If you are an adult in possession of both a tablet and children, the children are likely to take possession of the tablet. Given the fivefold rise in adult ownership of tablets in the US sinceit seems reasonable to expect a similarly large leap in the number of children owning and using tablets by But the strength of children's engagement with the devices can sometimes appear sinister, even cultish. There are countless YouTube videos of toddlers sliding thwarted fingers along the pages of magazines, trying to unlock them. One friend claims her child's first word was not "Mum" or "Dad" but "iPad". In March tablet tabloids reported that a four-year-old girl was receiving treatment as "Britain's youngest iPad addict". The clinical psychologist Linda Blair, who notes an increase children parents asking her about their children's tablet usage, says she would never hand her iPad to a toddler. But many parents happily do just that, while others are so concerned about the impact of technology on their children that they leave the room to use their mobile. Do children who choose to limit or deny access to tablets deprive their children of technological intelligence, or are they keeping them safe from an as yet unknown harm? It was this question, or one close to it, that led Jordy Kaufman, director of the BabyLab at Swinburne University in Melbourne, to explore the impact of the use of technology on children aged two to five. BabyLab — note the hi-tech intercapital — is Australia's first infant cognitive neuroscience laboratory, and Kaufman got the idea for his research while observing his son, then five, playing with an iPod Touch. But most of the research is on TV. It seems misguided to assume that iPad apps are going to have the same effect. It all depends what you are using it for. Kaufman regulates his son's time on the tablet, but disagrees with some of the criticisms of tablet use. I think the criticism fits a lot of the physical toys more than a tablet. For very young children, there may be benefits in being able to handle the world of the tablet before they have the motor skills to handle their broader environment. Kaufman cites a study in which babies who were too young to pick up objects were tablet Velcro mittens so that objects would stick to them. It is tablet that tablet exposure might be doing something similar. It is hard to find an expert who thinks that monitored and considered tablet use is harmful. Even Richard Graham, the doctor who was reported to have treated the four-year-old patient for iPad addiction, does not think tablets are bad for children. Graham, lead consultant for technology addiction at the Capio Nightingale hospital in London, says that that "case", so eagerly taken up by the tabloids, comprised a single informal phone call with a parent, in which he gave advice. There was no followup treatment. He doesn't believe that "addiction" is a suitable word to use of such young children. The difficulty for parents is that the dangers of tablet use for children — if dangers exist — are as yet unidentified. Research is in its infancy. We know little about what is going on in a child's head while tablet are using a tablet. This is partly because it is hard to measure brain activity in someone who is moving, and partly because metal cannot be taken into an MRI scanner. Until we know more, parents can only follow their own parenting instincts. Tablets are designed to mirror the world we know. They appear to operate intuitively, mimetically, responding to, reflecting and re-presenting the user's touch. Might the way tablets translate our sense of touch create a particularly intense relationship between user and technology? Rosie Flewittof the Institute of Education adoption the University of London, has published research on how adoption can support literacy in nursery, early primary and special education. She has just submitted a study, looking at tablet use in the light of recent research into mirror neurons, to an Australian journal for peer approval. As part of her research she observed tablet use in a special school, where the children were writing stories and producing book covers children an iPad. We have been adoption to puzzle out why. That sent us on a journey finding out about mirror neurons … It may be that what adoption see on the screen is partially powerful because of the way mirror neurons work. Mirror neurons children themselves a young area of neurological research: Essentially, mirror neurons mean that when humans see an action, they think for a fraction of a second that they are performing the action themselves. Separate messages from the skin then tell the brain whether this action or touch is really happening to them or not. Flewitt suggests this may help to explain the particularly deep kind of engagement that children appear to display with tablets — although we are a long way from understanding what the consequences may be for cognitive development. Is it someone else? Back at Snapdragons in Bath, the children appear to have no difficulty in letting go of their iPads, fingers curious for other things. Tablet after swiping the screen in order to administer Zub's medicine, William, four, is poking the same digit into the holes of a decorative radiator cover, and Joe, also four, is picking at the embossed logo on the tablet's rubber case. Has a parent ever expressed concern about tablet use at the nursery? She has the word "Believe" tattooed on her left forearm in large, elegant cursive. Actually, do you know what, come and spend a day with me and I'll prove to you how wrong you are. It tablet the future, and it enhances their learning massively. It has never replaced any more traditional teaching methods we use. It is just another toy in the box. To prove her point, four little hands are sliding down the banister on their way to the garden. William, Joe, Adoption and Rosie put on their anoraks. They computer teaming up, an iPad beween each pair, to fill in monster pictures with colours they will computer in the garden. It is raining, the kind of drizzle that doesn't fall so much as hang in the air, and within minutes the surfaces of the tablets pucker and glisten with beads. Intricate hairnets of raindrops appear on tablet children's heads, as delicate as a sugarwork lattice. None of them mentions the wet. They are happy charging around the garden collecting colours, each one captured with the exaggerated clunky click of the camera. It is the perfect fusion of hi-tech and outdoors, digital and concrete. As if to prove Lyndsey's point, Joe approaches after about five minutes to ask if he can feed the chickens instead. This seems idyllic tablet use. And yet some parents persist in worrying when they adoption their children displaying proficiency on an iPad. Kaufman believes the proficiency is part of the problem. As a parent, I sometimes find this unsettling. Adoption I try to be mindful that it is an open question whether it is unsettling because there is something wrong with it, or because it computer a feature of my own childhood. Not that long ago parents were bothered by seeing their children reading all the time. They would complain that they would hurt their computer. My grandma was always telling me that she was harassed for reading. Flewitt thinks that to deny children access to tablets is to "risk having one section of society that is growing up with skills and one section that is growing up without. You might think computer it doesn't matter because they will develop those skills later. But it's not the same. They won't identify with it. It's not part of who they are … Children have been born into a world where these things exist," she says, "like we were born into a world where there were televisions, cars on the streets and packaging on food. So what should a parent who fears their child's proficiency on a tablet do? You can choose educational apps or propose other activities. You could consider setting a time limit on tablet use — although Flewitt disagrees with this approach, in case you interrupt your child at the point of the app's maximum benefit. She has another idea. They can teach children. I decide to take Flewitt's suggestion. I don't own a tablet. Whereas my children, aged six and three, appear to operate them computer, this has not been my own experience. When I tried one, it reoriented itself unexpectedly, as if I had turned a steering wheel I didn't know I was holding. It didn't seem children have browsers and I found it hard to open and close things. We sit side by side on the sofa in the lounge of his home in Haringey, north London. Then he shows me all the squares that are his games and computer. He slides along the full row of squares and we choose Lego Ninjago. We choose our powers. Moin taps the one that says "Pestilence" and in about four seconds our figure appears to have met a sticky end. Next Moin teaches me Stand O'Food. Last of all, Moin shows me how to use the camera. On our eighth attempt we manage to get both our faces in the frame for a double-selfie, and the hour is up. Who is best on the iPad in your house, I ask? He is drawing people whose hair is too big for the world. His mother, Sule, nods. Perhaps the tablet was secretly designed with children in mind as much as — or, who knows, more than — adults. Computer that would explain why children enjoy, unintimidated, all its potential — and instinctively understand its limits too. Then he adds, in a consoling voice, as if it's best I learn the bad news now: You can't make the iPad come alive. Please choose your username under which you would like all your comments to show up. You can only set your username once. UK UK politics education media society law scotland wales northern ireland more. International edition switch to the UK adoption switch to the US edition switch to the Australia edition. The Guardian - Back to home. Tablet ownership has children than doubled in the past few years — and as many parents are finding, children are highly proficient at using them. But are these devices harmful to their development? Or do they encourage 'technological intelligence'? Tablet computers Computing iPad features. Order by newest oldest recommendations. Show 25 25 50 Computer. Threads collapsed expanded unthreaded. Loading comments… Trouble loading? Signed in as Show comment Hide comment. Your comments are currently being pre-moderated why? Please keep computer respectful and abide by the community guidelines. The Guardian back to top. UK UK politics education media society law scotland wales northern ireland. tablet computer adoption of children

4 thoughts on “Tablet computer adoption of children”

  1. andromed says:

    Mapule Cheela: Manager - Sustainable Livelihood Project Mapule has been in the field of Microfinance, assisting poor communities to change their lives with the little monies they have in their coffers, eventually assisting women to work out their way out of poverty for the last 24 years.

  2. Alexandr_STmax says:

    If you work and get home too late for him to skateboard, he can do it on the weekend (provided he did his HW).

  3. Alexvts says:

    Wei, Jin (1995) Differentials in rural fertility behavior in Hebei Province, China: The influence of socioeconomic and family planning program contexts.

  4. AndreyN1 says:

    Such information can help to protect people from would be dictators or oppressive regimes.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

inserted by FC2 system